The year 1977 was distinguished by a curious proliferation of astronomical anomalies that resist easy integration into orthodox explanatory models. Among these, two have achieved a certain notoriety: the narrowband “Wow!” signal captured by the Ohio State University Radio Observatory on 15 August, and the so-called Petrozavodsk phenomenon of 20 September the same year, in which vast luminescent formations traversed the skies of Karelia, defying classification as auroral, meteorological, or artificial.1 Less well known, owing to a combination of institutional discretion and the compromised health of those involved, is the incident that transpired at Valis Observatory in early November.
Overlooking the Shropshire town of Yaughton, Valis remains the most advanced observatory of its time, with six towers each featuring distinct instrumental complements coordinated to provide a versatile platform for both radioastronomy and optical spectroscopy. Staffed by a cohort of young researchers under the guidance of senior astronomers, by 1977 it had achieved international recognition for its contributions to pulsar cartography and deep-space survey.2
It was in this environment—at once rigorous, modern, and disciplined—that the phenomenon occurred, and it is precisely the prestige of Valis that renders the incident so troubling. The censored data that has been released, supplemented by testimony from staff and fragmentary writings, suggest the intrusion of a phenomenon that simultaneously eluded classification and exacted catastrophic physiological consequences upon its human observer.
The Phenomenon of 2 November 1977
According to surviving logs and instrument readouts, the skies above Shropshire were unusually clear on the night of 2 November. At 22:18 GMT, an astronomer stationed in Tower VI, the command centre and primary facility at the observatory, reported an “incipient pattern of radiance” forming near the zenith, a formation of light which shifted and pulsed with apparent regularity. Within minutes, similar manifestations were recorded at Towers II and V, suggesting that the display was not a mere local optical aberration.
The phenomenon expanded across the southern sky, with golden orbs breaking from the formation to ‘draw’ spectral halos and swooshes that registered anomalously on both photographic plates and photomultiplier outputs. Magnetic sensors recorded no geomagnetic disturbance, and barometric pressure remained steady. The effect, by all instrumental accounts, was a luminous geometry detached from known atmospheric dynamics.
The astronomer in Tower VI—whose name, owing to legal and ethical considerations, shall not be reproduced here—is later captured on reel-to-reel recordings oscillating between calm description and an increasingly disjointed litany of numbers, syllables, and incantations. At approximately 23:41 GMT, his speech becomes frenzied, declaring the orbs of light to be “alive, communicative, responsive to my gaze.”
The subsequent fifteen minutes of tape have never been officially released. Accounts from those few who heard them post-incident describe “a crescendo of ecstatic shouting” culminating in the phrase: “The stars have chosen me!”3 After this, silence ensues. The astronomer was discovered hours later, collapsed amidst his instrumentation with what attending physicians described as symptoms of unexplained haemorrhaging; pressure in the brain that is normally consistent with a brain tumour.
Eyewitness testimony is absent due to the lone working practices of the astronomers stationed at the tower.
Institutional Response
The incident precipitated an immediate lockdown of Valis Observatory. Surviving data—magnetic readouts, spectral recordings, and photographic negatives—were sequestered by the Ministry of Defence under the rubric of “classified aerial phenomena.”4 The available photographic plates since released by the MOD—underexposed and partially fogged—show faint streaks of light, though subsequent analysis has argued they may be artefacts of lens aberration. Staff were instructed not to discuss the matter publicly, and official statements attributed the astronomer’s death to “a congenital medical condition coincident with routine observation.”
Yet within the astronomical community, rumours persisted. The peculiar golden orbs of light—resembling cellular or crystalline patterns rather than fluid auroral sheets—suggested an order alien to known atmospheric optics. Whispered comparisons were drawn to the Soviet reports of Petrozavodsk, though the Valis case bore the additional element of direct physiological consequence, as though the phenomenon exerted an invasive influence upon human neurovascular systems.
Instrumental Anomalies and Data Integrity
Beyond the tragic physiological consequences observed, the Valis incident raises equally serious questions about the reliability and interpretation of the observatory’s data systems. Analysis of spectrographic plates from Towers II and V revealed faint banding patterns inconsistent with either instrumental calibration error or conventional atmospheric scattering. These orbs persisted for up to thirty minutes on continuous exposure, yet disappeared entirely on shorter integrations, a paradox that has not been reconciled by current models of optical interference.5
Radio instrumentation also exhibited unusual signatures. At 1420 MHz, several receivers detected bursts of narrowband emission synchronous with the appearance of the luminous tessellations. The bursts did not correspond to known terrestrial sources and, crucially, exhibited a shifting frequency drift that mirrored the oscillatory rhythm reported visually by observers. While it remains possible that these emissions were artefacts of cross-modulation or terrestrial interference, the coincidence of timing across multiple independent systems suggests an authentic external stimulus.
The correlation between optical geometry and radio-frequency anomaly is of particular importance. If substantiated, it would suggest that the phenomenon constituted not a passive optical display but an organised system radiating across multiple spectra. Such a pattern strains current astrophysical paradigms, for no known atmospheric or astronomical phenomenon displays this level of cross-domain coherence. The implications are twofold: first, that the Valis anomaly was real and not subjective misperception; and second, that it possessed energetic properties capable of perturbing both observational instrumentation and biological systems.
Interpretive Models
Several explanatory models have been proposed in restricted circulation in the years since the incident. Initial explanations sought recourse in meteorological phenomena. Some suggested a particularly vivid form of noctilucent cloud, though the geometry of the orbs contradicted known patterns.6 Others posited auroral activity, yet geomagnetic indices for that night were exceptionally low. The possibility of a covert military experiment—laser projections or high-altitude illumination tests—was raised in correspondence between the Ministry of Defence and the Meteorological Office, but no documentation substantiates such claims.
A minority of contemporaries, notably Dr Margaret Wetherall of Durham, argued that the incident represented “a liminal biological plasma, emergent between atmosphere and ionosphere.”7 Her controversial paper in Annals of Speculative Astronomy (1979) invoked the nascent field of astrobiology to suggest that such formations might constitute non-carbonaceous life, “diffuse, radiant, and non-localised.” Although derided at the time, her proposal resonates uneasily with later discussions of self-organising plasma phenomena on Saturn and Jupiter.
More unsettling, Dr. Walter E. Crofton of the New England Experimental Research Institute posits that the golden orbs were not passive but actively communicative, engaging directly with cognitive processes. He has preliminarily termed this “astro-psychic contagion” where observers of anomalous celestial phenomena exhibit symptoms of obsession, possession, or madness.8 This expands on a theory first put forward in this very periodical in 1966 that language is perhaps a virus.9 In this light, the astronomer’s exclamation—“The stars have chosen me!”—reads less as poetic flourish than as the horror of an invasive epistemic encounter.
None of these models have attained consensus, but all underscore the disturbing possibility that human observation of the cosmos entails more than passive recording—it risks exposure to agencies or entities beyond empirical containment.
The 1977 Valis Observatory incident remains, even three years on, a profound enigma. Unlike other anomalies of the period, which resembled a mechanical artefact of atmospheric optics, this was characterised by reciprocity: the orbs of light appeared to respond to observation, eliciting from the astronomer not detached measurement but existential transformation. Its implications are twofold: first, that the cosmos may harbour modes of organisation resembling life without conforming to terrestrial biology; second, that human cognition and physiology may be vulnerable to direct, deleterious engagement with such phenomena.
Whether the astronomer who succumbed was indeed “chosen,” as he insisted, cannot be ascertained but is is clear that the incident is the first recorded instance of human consciousness colliding with a mode of life so radically other that recognition itself is catastrophic. Thus his fate illustrates the perilous threshold at which modern astronomy now stands: a discipline confronting not merely the vastness of space but the possibility of invasive intelligences woven into the very fabric of the night sky.
- Kuznetsov, A. V. On the Phenomenology of Radiant Anomalies. Leningrad: Akademiya Nauk, 1978. ↩︎
- Valis Observatory Annual Report, 1976 (Yaughton Archive, restricted access). ↩︎
- Wetherall, M. Personal testimony, Durham University Oral History Project, 1978. ↩︎
- Ministry of Defence Memorandum on Astronomical Incidents, 1978 (declassified summary). ↩︎
- Hartridge, N. “Spectrographic Artefacts and Anomalous Geometries.” Proceedings of the Royal Astronomical Instrumentation Society 18 (1979): 201–220. ↩︎
- Hollings, P. “Noctilucent Clouds and Misidentification.” Quarterly Journal of Meteorological Anomalies 12 (1980): 77-94. ↩︎
- Wetherall, M. “Diffuse Plasma as Proto-Biological Entity.” Annals of Speculative Astronomy 3, no. 2 (1979): 45-61. ↩︎
- Crofton, W.E. “Astro-Psychic Contagion: Madness and the Cosmos in the Twentieth Century.” (1980): 23–39. ↩︎
- Ashcroft, L. P. “The Viral Ontology of Linguistic Transmission: A Hypercomplex Analysis” Sokal Nouveau #051 ↩︎
Sokal Nouveau 